Pages

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Olympic Games Open

I just watched the opening ceremonies for the Winter Olympic games: it opened with the pagan god Vulcan at his forge, featured Disco music in the middle, and ended with the atheistic John Lennon song "Imagine". Yes, this Enlightenment institution is completely secular; however, they seem to promote secularism instead of just secularity. But the ceremonies were quite pretty at times, and I otherwise enjoyed them.

In ancient times, as well as now, the Olympics were a huge event. The Fathers of the Church used Olympic imagery in their writings.

According to John Cassian, in his Institutes:
That in our spiritual contest we ought to draw an example from the carnal contests...he who aims at preparing himself for the crown of glory...should first in the Olympic and Pythian games give evidence of his abilities as a youth, and his strength in its first beginnings; since in these the younger men who want to practise this training are tested as to whether they deserve or ought to be admitted to it, by the judgment both of the president of the games and of the whole multitude.

And when the scrutiny is the of the president of the contest finds that we are stained by no infamy of disgraceful lust, and when we are judged by him not to be slaves of the flesh, and ignoble and unworthy of the Olympic struggle against our vices, then we shall be able to enter the lists against our equals, that is the lusts of the flesh and the motions and disturbances of the soul. For it is impossible for a full belly to make trial of the combat of the inner man: nor is he worthy to be tried in harder battles, who can be overcome in a slight skirmish.

This then is our first contest, this is as it were our first trial in the Olympic games, to extinguish the desires of the palate and the belly by the longing for perfection.

How, after the fashion of the Olympic games, a monk should not attempt spiritual conflicts unless he has won battles over the flesh...And so when the desires of the belly and of the palate have been by these considerations overcome, and when we have been declared, as in the Olympic contests, neither slaves of the flesh nor infamous through the brand of sin, we shall be adjudged to be worthy of the contest in higher struggles as well....


St. John Chrysostom, from various homilies:
Nay, they will not so much as imitate them that wrestle in the Olympic games, who although so great a multitude is sitting there, and so many princes, desire to please but one, even him who adjudges the victory amongst them; and this, though he be much their inferior. But thou, though thou hast a twofold motive for displaying the victory to Him, first, that He is the person to adjudge it, and also, that He is beyond comparison superior to all that are sitting in the theatre,—thou art displaying it to others, who so far from profiting, do privily work thee the greatest harm.

For conquering by doing ill is one of the devil's laws. Hence in the Olympic games which were celebrated to him it is so that all the competitors conquer. But in Christ's race this is not the rule about the prize, for, on the contrary, the law is for the person smitten, and not for the person smiting, to be crowned.

Tell me then, I beseech [you], in the Olympic games does not the herald stand, calling out with loud and uplifted voice, saying, "Does any one accuse this man? Is he a slave? Is he a thief? Is he one of wicked manners?" And yet, those contests for prizes are not of the soul nor yet of good morals, but of strength and the body. If then where there is exercise of bodies, much examination is made about character, how much rather here, where the soul is alone the combatant.

Many of you have often beheld the Olympic games: and not only have beheld but have been zealous partisans and admirers of the combatants, one of this [combatant], one of that. You know then that both during the days of the contests, and during those nights, all night long the herald thinks of nothing else, has no other anxiety, than that the combatant should not disgrace himself when he goes forth...If therefore he who is about to strive before men, uses such forethought, much more will it befit us to be continually thoughtful, and careful, since our whole life is a contest.

For if on occasion of a wrestler's success, not a herald below but the king above should have risen up and himself proclaimed the Olympic Victor, would not this have seemed to him more glorious than the crown, and have turned the gaze of the whole theatre upon him? When then no mortal king, but God Himself, not in this theatre but in the theatre of the universe, in the assembly of the angels, the archangels, proclaimeth his name with uplifted voice shouting from heaven, tell me what place shall we assign to this holy man?

If now it should happen, as I pray it may not happen nor at any time fall out, that there be a war against churches, and a persecution, imagine how great will be the ridicule, how sore the reproaches. And very naturally; for when no one exercises himself in the wrestling school, how shall he be distinguished in the contests? What champion, not being used to the trainer, will be able, when summoned by the Olympic contests, to show forth anything great and noble against his antagonist? Ought we not every day to wrestle and fight and run? See ye not them that are called Pentathli [pentathletes], when they have no antagonists, how they fill a sack with much sand, and hanging it up try their full strength thereupon? And they that are still younger, practise the fight against their enemies upon the persons of their companions. These do thou also emulate, and practise the wrestlings of self denial. For indeed there are many that provoke to anger, and incite to lust, and kindle a great flame. Stand therefore against thy passions, bear nobly the mental pangs, that thou mayest endure also those of the body.

And whereas the Olympic judge proclaims and crowns the victor, and the master rewards the servant, and the king the soldier, and each in general him that hath done him service, with what good things he can; shall God alone, after those so great toils and labors, repay them with no good thing great or small? shall those just and pious men, who have walked in every virtue, lie in the same state with adulterers, and parricides, and manslayers, and violators of tombs?


Origen, on fasting:
Let Olympic...boxers cram themselves to satiety. To them bodily ambition is suitable to whom bodily strength is necessary; and yet they also strengthen themselves by xerophagies. But ours are other thews and other sinews, just as our contests withal are other; we whose "wrestling is not against flesh and blood, but against the world's power, against the spiritualities of malice." Against these it is not by robustness of flesh and blood, but of faith and spirit, that it behoves us to make our antagonistic stand. On the other hand, an over-fed Christian will be more necessary to bears and lions, perchance, than to God; only that, even to encounter beasts, it will be his duty to practise emaciation.


From the Apostolic Constitutions, on whom to accept to Baptism, and whom to reject:
If any one be a maintainer of harlots, let him either leave off to prostitute women, or else let him be rejected. If a harlot come, let her leave off whoredom, or else let her be rejected. If a maker of idols come, let him either leave off his employment, or let him be rejected. If one belonging to the theatre come, whether it be man or woman, or charioteer, or dueller, or racer, or player of prizes, or Olympic gamester, or one that plays on the pipe, on the lute, or on the harp at those games, or a dancing-master or an huckster, either let them leave off their employments, or let them be rejected.


St. Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata:
[T]hough the wild olive be wild, it crowns the Olympic victors...So also the philosopher, resembling the wild olive, in having much that is undigested, on account of his devotion to the search, his propensity to follow, and his eagerness to seize the fatness of the truth; if he get besides the divine power, through faith, by being transplanted into the good and mild knowledge, like the wild olive, engrafted in the truly fair and merciful Word, he both assimilates the nutriment that is supplied, and becomes a fair and good olive tree. For engrafting makes worthless shoots noble....


After a thousand years of the Olympics, the emperor Theodosius ended the games in A.D. 393.

Friday, February 10, 2006

Turkish youths threaten to kill Catholic friar

A group of Turkish youths threatened to kill a Catholic friar, grabbing him by the throat and shouting "God is Greatest", just days after a Catholic priest was shot dead in Turkey, the friar said on Friday.
Source.

The Italian Bishops' conference hopes to open the beatification process for Father Andrea Santoro, murdered this week in Turkey.

Married Catholic Priest

Article about a married Catholic priest; was an Episcopalian: http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/13843047.htm.

Fr. Gregory Elder is one of about 80 former Episcopalian priests in the U.S. who have been ordained as Catholic priests. The same provision exists for former Lutheran pastors. But if he loses his wife, he can never remarry.

Typically, in Eastern Catholicism and Orthodoxy, parish priests can be married before their ordinations, but cannot marry afterwards. And in all of the Churches, religious order priests and Bishops can never be married. About 20% of all Catholic priests are married.

During the French Revolution, priests were forced to get married by the tyrannical government, under penalty of death. After the restoration of the Church, they were allowed to serve as married Catholic priests.

There are reasons why a married priesthood is discouraged. Theologically, a priest stands in the person of Christ, whose bride is the Church. Practically, a priest is required to be available to his flock at all times; also, parish priest salaries are currently quite low (and nonexistent for religious order priests).

Swedes Attempt to Recreate Stradivarius Violins

See this article, Swedes Go High-Tech to Crack Stradivari Code, courtesy of Dappled Things.

Researchers are attempting to recreate Stradivarius violins from scratch. It's a notoriously difficult process, since details such as precise geometry of the parts, the varnish, pre-treatment of the wood, and even the spacing of tree rings in the wood have an influence. The process to make these violins was not secret, but instead is lost; economic turmoil scattered Stradivarius' documents. It is interesting to note that many of these violins have even been subsequently improved by stiffening.

There could be a range of opinions on this:
  • 1. Why bother? We have electric guitars and synthesizers now.

  • 2. Why bother? We have good master violin makers nowadays, and they don't need to duplicate what has been done in the past.

  • 3. Whether or not you like the Stradivarius sound or not is just a matter of personal taste. I have no opinion on the wisdom of reproducing these violins.

  • 4. Stradivarius violins are very expensive. If we could duplicate their sound, then we could make a lot of money selling new ones.

  • 5. Expert musicians prefer these violins, so we ought to reproduce them.

  • 6. These violins produce the "standard" violin sound that concert-goers are used to, so we ought to reproduce them.

  • 7. These violins produce an objectively superior sound, and I can prove it.


Answers #1 would probably come from a teenager or a Marxist, while #2 would come from a Socialist. Why bother with history?
Answer #3 is from the modern Relativist, unwilling to take a stand.
Answer #4 comes from someone who is money-minded.
Answer #5 is the mainstream view, as would be broadcast on CNN. "Experts say..."
Answer #6 could be the mainstream view of serious music-lovers.
Answer #7 may very well be true. Reasoned opinions on the quality of these violins may be influenced by, but are not determined by, answers #4-6.

Western music theory was started by Pythagoras, who determined how the notes in a musical scale are influenced by the length, thickness, and tension of strings in plucked instruments. These notes are interrelated by simple, fixed ratios of small whole numbers. Pythagoras noted that these same fixed ratios are also seen in the cosmos, in the orbits of the planets, and that there may be a universal mathematical law relating music and physics. The fact that the same musical laws were discovered independently in other civilizations gives us a clue that these may actually be universal, as was suspected by Pythagoras.

Each listener subjectively experiences music through his sense of hearing. However, I don't want to stop at this subjectivity: it seems that everyone can think musically. Beethoven became deaf, but still was able to compose music that the non-hearing-impaired could appreciate; Beethoven's condition is impossible to discern in his later music. Even people who never had the sense of hearing can appreciate music in a certain way, by musically sensing the vibrations of a piano, for example: they feel the music, and appreciate it as music, and not just as the sense of touch.

We live in the real world and actual musical instruments have an infinite number of material and formal properties that determine the kind of sound that is produced. Constructing and tuning an instrument is a very high art, but also is dependent on objective science. The fact that these sound-producing machines are called instruments—a word shared with other very expensive, precision technical machines—tells us of the complication and refinement that goes into designing them. You can't just arbitrarily throw together a sound-producing device and expect it to produce good sound, or at least sound that would be appreciated anywhere other than a modern university musicology department. Nearly everyone will reject a poor violin badly played, and for the same reason.

Music theory is a very difficult subject, but we should not let this deter us from the pursuit of thinking about music objectivity, and using right reason when incorporating music into our liturgies and daily lives.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Website of Fr. Michael Witt

Fr. Michael Witt, host of the show Modern Church History on Covenant Network, has a website, http://www.michaeljohnwitt.com where you can download audio recordings of his show.

At this time, eighty episodes are online (minus episode 79, which is broken). It starts with the beginning of the end of Medieval Christendom, in 1274, when all of Western Europe was Catholic, monasteries and universities were large and growing, cities were prosperous, and the Church and State cooperated with each other.

But in that year the giants of medieval thinking, St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Bonaventure died, and within a couple decades there were no more saints. This was followed by 11 popes in 25 years, and a lack of continuity in the Church. The Black Death totally wiped out many religious orders; and the serious study of philosophy was ended for centuries. Formerly, whenever a crisis threatened the Church, there was a great reform that restored Christendom: but not this time. Instead, the dual opposed forces of the Enlightenment and Reformation started, becoming the Modernism in which we live today. Modernism opposes faith against reason, and church against state.

The latest episodes are on Islamic Jihadism and the Iranian Nuclear threat; but ends with a new hope.

Original episodes are broadcast on these Saint Louis radio stations:

WRYT 1080 AM
KHOJ 1460

Live streaming broadcasts are available over the Internet, from the Covenant Network website: http://www.covenantnet.net