Tuesday, November 22, 2005


Apparently, it's been leaked. There doesn't seem to be anything in it that wasn't expected: http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=40891

1 comment:

  1. I have heard comments that this document may not be authentic. Some claim that it is a composite of recent media speculation. It is LESS restrictive than current practice, and lacks the usual references to authoritative biblical and patristic sources.